Response to Interrogatories
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
October 22, 2024
Favorable decision for the Response to Interrogatories regarding termination from previous employment.
Debarment
Marine Corps Air Station Miramar
October 18, 2024
A client was barred from entering a base due to allegations that the client shoplifted. The Edmunds Law Firm was able to show that the alleged shoplifting was inadvertent and caused by the client being distracted by their children. The base commander agreed and lifted the barment
Response to SOR
Defense Counterintelligence Security Agency (DCSA)
Guideline: K (Handling Protected Information), M(Use of Information Technology)
October 8, 2024
The Client hired us to respond to an SOR alleging improper handling of sensitive information and improper usage of government IT systems. After lengthy investigation of the evidence, the firm was able to defend the client from these allegations. The government dismissed the SOR upon being presented with the client’s response.
Hearing
Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals (DOHA)
Guideline: F (Financial Considerations, Debt)
September 26, 2024
The client was facing loss of her security clearance due to unpaid debts that resulted from the loss of her job due to the pandemic. After a successful hearing, a judge granted the client’s clearing at the requested level.
Security Clearance Hearing
Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals (DOHA)
Guideline: H (Drug use), E (Personal Conduct)
September 20, 2024
The Edmunds Law Firm was hired by its client who was accused of using marijuana prior to accepting a position in as a federal contractor. After litigating the matter, the firm represented the client at a Security Clearance Hearing, during which the firm successfully argued that the past drug use did not make the client a security risk today. The Judge agreed and issued the client a clearance at the level requested.
DOHA
Guideline: F
September 18, 2024
This client had multiple charged off accounts and delinquent accounts after strong mitigating exhibits and written response the board granted this client with security access.
Security Clearance Hearing
Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals (DOHA)
Guideline: F (Financial Concerns, Debt)
September 14, 2024
The client retained Edmunds Law Firm after receiving an SOR for unpaid commercial debt and student loans. At the hearing, we demonstrated that these financial issues were due to circumstances beyond the client’s control and that he had taken significant steps to resolve them. The judge accepted our arguments and reinstated the client’s clearance.
Global Access Reconsideration Petition
US Department of Homeland Security
September 12, 2024
The Edmunds Law firm was hired to represent a traveler who was denied a Global Access membership for reasons they did not disclose. After a comprehensive background check, the firm was able to find a long-forgotten court case from decades before in the client’s past. The firm then set out to mitigate that issue with the agency. The Agency agreed that the prior issue did not make the client a security risk, and granted Global Access to the client.
DOHA
Guideline: E & H
September 12, 2024
This client Statement of Reasons alleged they used Marijuana while holding a sensitive position although it was true we were able to compile supporting documents and a strong argument to mitigate the government concerns on the clients drug usage and trustworthiness on holding a clearance. After the Board heavy consideration of the facts the clients security access was granted.
Military Discharge Upgrade
US Department of Homeland Security
September 5, 2024
The client hired the Edmunds Law Firm to obtain an upgrade to their other-than-honorable discharge in lieu of court martial. Despite very serious allegations, the firm convinced the board that their client took full responsibility for their actions and had, over the years, made amends for them though years of helping other veterans. The Client’s discharge was upgraded, allowing access to more resources to help other veterans.
Military Discharge Upgrade
Department of the Army
September 4, 2024
Favorable determination. Client’s military discharge was upgraded from “Under Other than Honorable Conditions” to “HONORABLE”
Security Clearance Hearing
Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals (DOHA)
Guideline: F (Financial Concerns, Taxes)
August 20, 2024
The client retained Edmunds Law Firm after receiving an SOR alleging non-payment of Federal and State Income taxes for several years. After litigating the matter and proceeding to a hearing, the firm was able to show to a judge’s satisfaction that the client’s tax problems were sue to circumstances out of their control, and that the client was successfully on-track to resolve their back taxes. The judge was convinced and reinstated the client’s clearance.
DCSA
Guideline: E
August 5, 2024
This client during her interview with a polygrapher needed to provide a foreign travel log however due to many miscommunication this could not be completed which resulted In the client receive the Statement of Reasons however we were able to receive a favorable decision on the written response on this matter.
Response to SOR
Defense Counterintelligence Security Agency (DCSA)
Guideline: E (Personal Conduct)
August 1, 2024
A government employee was accused of timecard fraud and was in peril of losing their security clearance and their job. After a lengthy examination of the facts and collection of evidence, the Edmunds Law Firm responded to the government and showed that the allegations against the client were false and caused by improper analysis of timecard data and other evidence. The Government withdrew the SOR.
Response to SOR
Defense Counterintelligence Security Agency (DCSA)
Guideline: E (Personal Conduct)
August 1, 2024
An federal employee was accused of lying to federal agents during an interview regarding a family member. The Edmunds Law Firm investigated and successfully responded to the SOR, proving to the government that the allegations against the client were unfounded. The Government dismissed the SOR, allowing the client to return to his job.
Response to SOR
Defense Counterintelligence Security Agency (DCSA)
Guideline: B (Foreign Influence)
July 29, 2024
The government was concerned about the client’s family connections in another country. We provided evidence showing that these relationships would not affect the client’s suitability for a security clearance This led to the Government dismissing the case against our client.
Security Clearance Hearing
Defense Counterintelligence Security Agency (DCSA)
Guideline: G (Alcohol Consumption), J (Criminal Activity)
July 26, 2024
The client’s guidelines cited concerns about controlled substance possession, DUI, convictions, and alcohol use. A psychological evaluation, arranged by our firm, indicated no current risk. Additional documents demonstrated the client’s commitment to a healthier lifestyle.
Security Clearance Hearing
National Security Agency (NSA)
Guideline: E (Personal Conduct), K (Handling Protected Information)
July 23, 2024
A worker was accused of improperly disseminating sensitive information to a coworker. The Edmunds Law Firm responded on behalf of the client and convinced the government that the allegations were a misunderstanding, and that the client should keep their job.
Security Clearance Hearing
Defense Counterintelligence Security Agency (DCSA)
Guideline: B (Foreign Influence)
July 16, 2024
The Client retained the Edmunds Law Firm after receiving an SOR alleging Guideline B Concerns due to having family overseas, owning foreign real estate, and having minimal cash on deposit in a foreign country. The firm successfully argued that the client’s connection to the United States and their records of successfully protecting classified information outweighed their overseas contacts.
Security Clearance Hearing
Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals (DOHA)
Guideline: F (financial, debt)
June 14, 2024
The client faced allegations of not paying debts. After our response and representation at the hearing, supported by evidence of the client’s efforts to pay debts and settle delinquent accounts, a favorable decision was reached.
Response to SOR, Hearing
U.S. Department of Justice
Guideline: E (Personal Conduct), J (Criminal Activity)
June 11, 2024
The client hired our firm to handle a response to a Statement of Reasons and a hearing. The government alleged that an altercation occurred with a significant other. We collected evidence, including a witness statement indicating that the claims were inaccurate, exaggerated, or false. This evidence, combined with our attorney’s strong representation, led to a favorable decision.
Debarment
Dept. of the Navy Acquisition Integrity Office
Guideline: Debarment
May 20, 2024
This case involved a response to a debarment related to timecard falsification. We worked with medical experts to support the client’s claims of medical issues. After reviewing our arguments and evidence, the agency reinstated the client.
Military Discharge Upgrade Petition
Navy Discharge Review Boards (NDRB)
April 30, 2024
The client hired us to draft a military petition brief with supporting exhibits. The matter proceeded to a hearing to address the petitioner’s PTSD, which had contributed to his Under Other Than Honorable discharge. After careful review and reconsideration, the board concluded that the discharge was proper but not equitable. As a result, the client was granted an Honorable discharge under Secretarial Authority.
Security Clearance Hearing
Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals (DOHA)
Guideline: H (Drug use), E (Personal Conduct)
May 19, 2024
The client responded independently and then hired our firm to represent him at the hearing. Before the judge, we presented supporting documents to address the government’s concerns, including a negative drug test, a statement of intent, and strong letters of recommendation. The decision commended the client’s upfront honesty throughout the process, noting that the cleint’s transparency and supporting documents contributed to the government’s favorable outcome.
Security Clearance Hearing
Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals (DOHA)
Guideline: H
January 24, 2024
DoD declined to grant our client a security clearance and a SOR was issued for concerns raised under guideline H (Drug Involvement). After a hearing a DOHA Judge denied client’s security clearance eligibility. We appealed and the board remanded the Judge’s decision.
DOHA
Guideline: J & F
January 24, 2024
The client had medical debts and had a few traffic infractions along with a DUI charge, and a Domestic Violence case. After heavy mitigation and strong arguments from our attorney this was mitigated and the client was reinstated.
DOHA
Guideline: B
January 22, 2024
Our team was able to mitigate the government concerns with heavy mitigating factors for the applicants family who reside in another country.
Department of Air Force
Guideline: Show Cause Action
January 3, 2024
This client hired our firm as they were suspended to classified information and received notification to Show cause. We responded to the suspension and Show cause accordingly and was able to reinstate our client.
Security Clearance Hearing
Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals (DOHA)
Guideline: E, H, J
December 13, 2023
Favorable decision for Response to SOR.
Security Clearance Hearing
Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals (DOHA)
Guideline: B, F
December 13, 2023
Client was granted a security clearance after receiving a SOR for having contact with citizens of Iraq and for having an account in Iraq. Favorable hearing decision.
Military Discharge Upgrade
Navy
December 11, 2023
Successfully upgraded discharge from Bad Conduct to Under Honorable Conditions (General).
Request for Separation (Based on Dependency or Hardship)
Army
December 11, 2023
Hardship discharge request was submitted and approved by Client’s brigade commander. Client was discharged in less than one month of retaining The Edmunds Law Firm.
CBP Obudsman US Customs and Border Protection
July 12, 2023
This client applied for Global Entry and was denied due to an incident in their remote past of one minor immigration violation that occurred 29 years ago. Since that time they have become a proud citizen and through our strong written appeal brief of their denial we were able to mitigate their concerns for the Applicant and having them obtain their Global Entry Access.